Have always been we the only real one here who sees a strange convergence between neo-Puritanism and Old Testament ethical codes?

1. All guys are rapists and all sorts of intercourse (involving a male) is rape.

2. If an unmarried girl ended up being raped under OT legislation, the rapist needed to spend her dad and marry her: “If a person satisfies a virgin that is maybe not betrothed, and seizes her and lies together with her, and they’re discovered, then your guy whom lay along with her shall offer towards the daddy associated with the young woman fifty shekels of silver, and she will probably be their spouse, because he has got violated her. He may perhaps maybe maybe not divorce her all their days. ” (Deut. 22:28-29)

There’s another passage in Exodus that offers the daddy the decision: “If a guy seduces a virgin5 that is maybe chatrandom app for android not betrothed and lies together with her, he shall supply the bride-price6 on her and make her his spouse. If her father utterly will not provide her to him, he shall spend money add up to the bride-price for virgins. ”

So that the basic concept is if a guy has intercourse with a lady, he produces a suggested contract of marriage if she desires it. This agreement would additionally stipulate his “marriageabilty” – that there is no impediment. Otherwise, he is able to have to spend a penalty.

(BTW, i recall once I had been assigned to my Navy base in Idaho into the mid-70s, one of the primary things they told us would be to never ever claim to others that people had been hitched to your associated with the regional females we dated, for the reason that it would develop a common-law marriage contract. )

It was my experience that (for reasons uknown) women that would be the many insanely promiscuous are those who would like to realize that you will be the essential that is marriagable in order to not trip their anti-slut defence apparatus. For the reason that line We remember reading of a Israeli instance where a Jewish woman had been keen to possess intercourse having a handsome guy that she had just met but would have to be guaranteed that her pick-up ended up being additionally Jewish. Obviously, he said he had been. He wasn’t; he had been Arab (we can’t let them know apart either) and also this had been sufficient for him become convicted of Rape. We confess to using done very same. Trust in me in case a dude keen to sleep me personally first demanded my assent towards the notion that the moon had been made from cream cheese i might concur and most likely include it was additionally particularly runny.

We ought to remember it was possible for a woman to receive damages by way of compensation should her fiancee terminate the engagement – the unspoken rationale of course being that by that time he had sampled the goods as it were and had thought better of it that it was not so long ago. It reminds me personally of an account that my dad utilized to inform me personally of an acquaintance of their who had been therefore sued for breach of vow. The presiding Judge had granted towards the ex-fiance by means of payment a large sum in a way that my dad commiserating along with his buddy regarding the measurements of the honor received the reaction ‘it had been inexpensive during the price’ – which is the reason why prostitutes constantly insist upon re payment up-front.

Professor Irina (whom lives in ny) is really a self-professed professional in Intellectual Property Law ( exactly just just what, whenever I had been young, we modestly called Passing-Off – in those days viewed as one of several less important Torts certainly the scene then had been that ultimately there is only 1 Tort – Negligence. That, because it ended up had been about as spectacularly a prediction that is wrong could possibly be! ). I wonder what exactly is therefore appealing to the girl Professor about Intellectual Property – no the type of thing girls frequently go set for. We additionally wonder whether an account was had by her at Tinder. I believe you should be told.